Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Proposal for CCT7 - Dates/Rules/Time controls.

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 05:25:24 12/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 12, 2004 at 02:24:59, Peter Skinner wrote:

>On December 12, 2004 at 02:04:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On December 12, 2004 at 01:07:05, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>
>>If you add 1 more rule people might take you even serious and that's
>>in case of a big dispute the players meeting decides.
>>
>>Where players meeting means every participant has 1 vote.
>>
>>By the way at that dual opteron that plays at fics, some other processes are
>>running eating more than 1 cpu, swapping out DIEP, and the book reduces playing
>>strength with a 1000 points i bet.
>>
>>16571 ralph     25   0 92832  24m  84m R 99.9  0.8   5973:11 kdeinit
>>
>>As you see it runs 5973 hours already.
>>
>>We will see how strong Gandalf is at Paderborn 2005 where some serious level
>>gets played with serious tournament books.
>>
>>People usually overrate programs which are hyper agressive. Hydra being best
>>example. It joins in Paderborn2005 though as it's on the participants list.
>>
>>Note that Gandalf always was a good blitz program, with a good book capable of
>>winning any blitz event.
>>
>>Vincent
>>
>
>What does FICS and Paderbourn2005 have to do with the CCT? Am I missing
>something?
>
>And what isn't serious about my offer? Would you like to TD the CCT?
>
>If you look at the rules that are not much different that the ones that Volker
>used. So how is he serious, and I am not?

Because you have proven to be a very hatred person who will do anything to give
those you dislike a push. Note that i'm not like that, you don't see any protest
from me against you leading the tournament. I'm sure you'll do a fine job if you
can stay objective and let the program do the pairings.

Note that i have more TD experiences than you might guess, but i'm not having
ambitions to lead a tournament at icc; i'm involved in enough events already and
a problem of being TD is that you are supposed to show up, which will be rather
hard for me this time if the tournament is a few days before or during IPCCC2005
tournament where i will be physical present :)

The real problem of the TD will be having a seeding that is realistic, where
programs which recently do well are seeded high.

In normal chess seeding is much easier because you can't *improve* chessplayers
suddenly that much, and you play more rounds in a tournament.

In our international Blitz event for example, which plays 5 march 2005, where
many GM's also will show up, we play 38 rounds 5 0.

Vincent

>Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.