Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:42:00 12/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2004 at 09:21:24, Joachim Rang wrote: >On December 12, 2004 at 06:46:47, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On December 12, 2004 at 06:01:36, Ray Banks wrote: >> >>>On December 12, 2004 at 05:54:02, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>> >>>>The most interesting chess system is since Pentium III a dual system. Much more >>>>interesting to look after a dual system. Believe me, you will have much more fun >>>>with your hobby. >>> >>>Or better still a Dual Athlon. I have 2 of them exclusively for ponder-on chess >>>tournaments :-) But if you also want it for gaming, or other uses, it will be >>>disappointing. The dual Athlon motherboards and chipsets are very dated - no >>>SATA, firewire, USB2 etc >>> >>>Dual Opteron would be fantastic as would a dual Xeon set-up, but horrendously >>>expensive >>> >>>If you want a general purpose machine (i.re. not juyt for chess) then an >>>Athlon64 is the way to go in my view >> >>Me too, I'm hoping to get a best general purpose machine which gives the best >>possible for all-round chess [esp. the top programs, and playing and analysing] >>within a reasonable budget (best value for money). >> Does this point to Athlon 64, one of the fastest (well, ALL of them are one of >>the fastest as there are not so many different Athlon 64's, I suppose). >> >>If that is difficult to obtain for any reason, what would be second best? >>S.Taylor > > >Best value for money is currently an Athlon AMD 64 3000+ in 90 Nanometer >(Winchester-Core) for about 160 $. You might consider to buy an 3500+ which runs >at 2.2 GHz (compared to 1.8 for 3000+) for about 270 ยง. I too would recommened >the Winchester-Core as it consumes less energy and runs cooler. > >regards Joachim Thanks for making it simple for me. That was what I wanted! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.