Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Genius3(!)-vs-MChessPro7 result; surprise?!

Author: Raul Kukk

Date: 13:52:10 01/19/99

Go up one level in this thread


On January 19, 1999 at 07:25:45, Harald Faber wrote:

>On January 19, 1999 at 07:17:11, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>
>>>>>So now it is done, 40 games were played with the following result:
>>>>>
>>>>>Genius3-MCP7: 9.0-11.0
>>>>>MCP7-Genius3: 7.0-13.0
>>>>>
>>>>>Sum: Genius3(!!) won 22-18.
>>>>>
>>>>>Conditions were:
>>>>>
>>>>>Genius3:      AMD-K6-200, 32MB hash, tournament book (!)
>>>>>MChessPro7.1: Intel166MMX, 40MB hash
>>>>>(Genius3 had 50% speed advantage)
>>>>
>>>>This is not really a surprise. Genius3 was rated about 2410 on P90 by SSDF. Add
>>>>another 90 to scale to P200/MMX and you see that G3 and MCP7 are very close, and
>>>>that's what your match seems to indicate.
>>>
>>>OK, if one adds 90 points. But it was not what one could have expected because
>>>the jump from 486/66->P90 was less than 60 points!
>>>I'd have expected 50 pts which makes 2460 and 166MMX reduce max. to 2480 (MCP)
>>>and therefore a close win for MCP.
>>>
>>>If you add 90 pts (!) for Genius3 P90->200MMX, it would be higher rated than
>>>Genius5 in SSDF. :-)))
>>>(I know, only 4 points but not as worse as one could expect by the huge version
>>>number difference that should indicate major changes).
>>
>>I admit that an increase of 90 is probably an overestimate. If I remember
>>correctly, Thoralf Karlsson obtained an average increase of 75. Nevertheless,
>>the resulting numbers for P200/MMX will be rather close. Don't forget that you'd
>>have to play hundreds of games in order to reliably verify a difference of the
>>order of 40/50 ELO points.
>>
>>Uli
>
>I know. What I wanted to see was if "old" programs which are not tested on
>actual hardware by SSDF is still able to compete with actual programs.
>
>Personally I say YES after this small match.
>
>And another point is that Genius3 does NOT seem to be weaker than Genius5.
>So all guys searching a cheap but strong program look for Genius3 e.g. and let
>it run on your fast PC. :-)
 It was not much surprising for me either.Even Genius2(so Genius 3)have good
resaults against CM5500 (mostly winning fast-control games and probably equal at
longer games)if useing faster PCs.Thx for this test(againstMCP)!!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.