Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IM Larry Kaufman's Review of the Novag Diamond.

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 15:39:13 01/19/99

Go up one level in this thread


On January 19, 1999 at 16:41:05, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:

>In the review of the Novag Diamond, it is stated by Mr. Kaufman that with the
>"Selectivity" feature on the computer rating is about 100 points higher. I am
>somewhat baffled at this because the "Brute Force" search mode would seem to be
>superior since it examines the position more extensively. Unfortunately, in the
>manual of my Mephisto atlanta, it doesn't say which is stronger only that Brute
>Force search minimizes the risk of an oversight. My question is whether Mr.
>Kaufman is correct in his assumption that Selective search is superior to Brute
>Force search? Also, if I remember correctly, Novag claimed according to Mr.
>Kaufman that Selective "On" was superior. Is there an answer from some authority
>as to whether Selective or Brute Force results in a higher rating?


Hi:
I am not authority in this but just an old fart that has had too many computers
along too many time and read too many about this to suspect with some ground
that brute or selective approaches has his strenghts and his weakneses, but in
the long run a good selective approach seems to be better as much is capable of
deeper searches and so can avoid traps, positional mistakes etc in better way
that the brute force. There are another reasons long to explain and beside I am
not the man to do so. This one, the brute force appraoch, is incarcerated inside
a narrow horizon due to the time it expends analyzing all in each branch of the
tree, but then this very same fact let the program to be more eficient in
tactical shots inside his narrowed horizon. Nevertheless, as selective approach
is not suicidical, rarely they commit mistakes that entails a fast defeat, but
on the contrary a brute force approach is prone to commit any mistake possible
beyond his horizon. So, selective seems to be superior and facts show it is so.
Demise of Spracklen team was due, people said, to his unbreakable attachment to
brute force or better said to a variation of it called full width search.
I hope I am not too much mistaken in all this
Greetings from Chile
fernando
Fernando



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.