Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About CCT7 rule no 1

Author: Stan Arts

Date: 06:56:33 12/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


Hi Reinhard,

Ah I see. Well, both Uci and Winboard have been aimed at standart chess, and in
that sence having a clear protocol without much extra's is good. Besides
variants, people can think of infinitly more features, and that wouldn't always
help the protocol be popular.

But indeed it would be interesting to have some sort of protocol that can
describe many variants.

With chess-variants, I guess a lot of people are stopped at writing a chess-
variantprogram, because there are no such protocols, so it's difficult to create
interest for it, as well as having some competition for the programmer itself.
(If I write a program for some exotic variant, it's lickely to be the only
program capable of playing it. (The same is also true for other boardgames,
outside the common chess checkers etc.) )

But Smirf might indeed help make the variants you mentioned more popular. For
instance it helps open competition.(protocol or not) And it sounds interesting!

Goodluck!

Stan



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.