Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Could it be the time control? See final tables of previous tournaments:

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 02:10:43 12/16/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 16, 2004 at 04:12:10, Jouni Uski wrote:

>Is it only coincidence, that Fritz is very low (after Aristarch) with Pentium,
>but leading both Athlon tournaments? Just wondering...
>
>Jouni


SUPER TOURNAMENT III FINAL

Athlon XP1900+
128mb hash or closest allowed for each engine
3,4,5 men tablebases
Ponder off
No learning
Engines using own books where able
List 512 using general.ctg
CM9000 Alliance using CM8000 book (manually converted)
CM10th Creep using powerbook with optimised settings
44 rounds at 40 moves in 2 hours repeating


Final Standings

31.0	- Shredder 8
28.5	- Deep Junior 8
23.5	- Deep Fritz 8
22.5	- CM10th Creep
22.0	- CM9000 Alliance
22.0	- Pharaon 3.00b
21.5	- Hiarcs 9
20.5	- Ruffian 2.1.0
20.0	- Chess Tiger 15
19.5	- List 512
16.5	- Aristarch 4.50
16.5	- Pro Deo 1.0


SUPER TOURNAMENT II

Athlon 2000
128mb hash each
3,4,5 piece tablebases
All using Fritz Powerbook (maximum variety, minimum 5 games for a move to be
played, no learning)
40 moves in 80 minutes repeating.
Ponder off
4 cycles (52 rounds)
Tournament run under Fritz GUI



FINAL STANDINGS (52 rounds)


Deep Fritz 8   		- 35.0
Shredder 8   		- 33.5
Hiarcs 9   		- 31.5
Ruffian 2.1.0   	- 27.5
CM9000 Judge    	- 27.5
Chess Tiger 15   	- 27.5
Aristarch 4.50    	- 26.5
Deep Junior 8   	- 26.0
SmarThink 0.17a   	- 25.5
List 512  	 	- 25.0
Deep Sjeng 1.6   	- 22.0
El Chinito 3.25   	- 21.5
Thinker 4.6b   		- 18.5
Crafty 19.13   		- 16.5




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.