Author: Mark R. Anderson
Date: 13:46:29 12/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2004 at 15:34:30, Andrei P wrote: >One way to check games for computer-assistance is to run them through engine and >see what % of moves played were predicted by the engine. My question is how to >simplify this process. > >I could see making an epd test with each move as a separate test entry. But this >seem too labor intensive. Is there a simpler way? If one wants to analyze many >games in this sort of way an easy strategy is needed. > >On a related note, what % of moves from GM games are reproduced by fritz or >other engine? which engine is the best at that? >Thank you, >Andrei Andrei, Perhaps not so many games. It seems to me that you would not want to check *all* games, even for the tail-enders. You would only want to check the games of people who did suspiciously well, like the unknown player who suddenly plays like a GM. Also, you would need to check where someone cried "foul!" Mark
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.