Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 02:10:58 12/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2004 at 02:02:33, Dan Honeycutt wrote:
>On December 18, 2004 at 01:26:08, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On December 17, 2004 at 23:18:51, Dan Honeycutt wrote:
>>
>>>On December 17, 2004 at 16:29:20, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>Junior 9 vs Shredder 8
>>>>50 games (23.0 - 27.0) loss for Junior 9
>>>>40'/40+40'/40+40'
>>>>Athlon 1.3/64 MB hash
>>>>own books, optimized
>>>>no ponder, learning off
>>>>3-/4-men EGTB
>>>>Kind regards
>>>>Kurt
>>>
>>>Hi Kurt:
>>>How do you feel Junior 9 compares to Junior 8?
>>>
>>>Best
>>>Dan H.
>>
>>
>> Hi Dan
>> Unfortunately I have not found the time to study
>> the games. And to say something on the basis of
>> only 50 games seems too early I think.
>> Kurt
>
>Fair enough. I tend to judge based on a superficial look at a game or two and,
>doing that, I've been impressed by Junior 9. That's why I was interested in a
>more reasoned and considered opinion - yours. As you have time for further
>tests and evaluations I'd like to hear what you think.
>
>Dan H.
Hi Dan
You can be sure that tests with Junior 9 under
same conditions will continue until 500-600
games have been played -:)
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.