Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 13:44:02 12/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2004 at 16:11:30, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>On December 19, 2004 at 16:07:18, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Hi Frank
>>You cannot yet compare Gandalf 6.0 with only 38 games
>>played vs Shredder8 with 222 games.
>>Kurt
>
>Hi Kurt,
>
>clear!
>The result is a good example for "Random".
>Gandalf 6.0 is strong but after all what I see not stronger as Shredder 8.0.
>With more games the ELO from Gandalf is more right.
>
>I think Gandalf with the own book is perhaps on the same level as Shredder with
>the multi Arena books I used for Shredder.
>
>Today I will start ATL League B with Gandalf again.
>I need more games for Gandalf 6.0 and this is the reason that Gandalf
>participant in the next six ATL rounds.
>
>Best
>Frank
Hi Frank
We have tested Gandalf 6.0 at 90m+30s
with 450 games and with yet 160 games
at 40'/40 in the Nunn2 test, see at
http://www.utzingerk.com/gan60_test.htm
I don't see the point why most people
are satisfied after 10-20 games -:)
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.