Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 13:48:34 12/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2004 at 16:44:02, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On December 19, 2004 at 16:11:30, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On December 19, 2004 at 16:07:18, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Hi Frank >>>You cannot yet compare Gandalf 6.0 with only 38 games >>>played vs Shredder8 with 222 games. >>>Kurt >> >>Hi Kurt, >> >>clear! >>The result is a good example for "Random". >>Gandalf 6.0 is strong but after all what I see not stronger as Shredder 8.0. >>With more games the ELO from Gandalf is more right. >> >>I think Gandalf with the own book is perhaps on the same level as Shredder with >>the multi Arena books I used for Shredder. >> >>Today I will start ATL League B with Gandalf again. >>I need more games for Gandalf 6.0 and this is the reason that Gandalf >>participant in the next six ATL rounds. >> >>Best >>Frank > > Hi Frank > We have tested Gandalf 6.0 at 90m+30s > with 450 games and with yet 160 games > at 40'/40 in the Nunn2 test, see at > http://www.utzingerk.com/gan60_test.htm > I don't see the point why most people > are satisfied after 10-20 games -:) > Kurt Hi Kurt, I know this results :-) Give me two months and each ATL engines have played around 260 games, Gandalf too. This need a while. For the ~ 6.000 games I need 11 months. But know let us look how strong is Gandalf in ATL League B. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.