Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Has there been any discussion about CSS 6/2004 sensation article??

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 23:43:50 12/21/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 22, 2004 at 02:07:46, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On December 22, 2004 at 02:04:10, Jouni Uski wrote:
>
>>Hopp oder top – Steigern Tablebases die Spielstärke?
>>Helmut Conrady untersucht in einem sehr breit angelegten Test die Auswirkungen
>>der Tablebases auf die Spielstärke von Schachprogrammen. Die Ergebnisse sind –
>>gerade auch für viele Programmierer – äußerst überraschend!
>>
>>Summary in english after reading article yesterday: after 1000s of games with
>>different levels and engines tablebases seems to have always NEGATIVE effect
>>on playing strength!! No doubt at all! Uri can easily forget implementing now..
>>
>>Jouni
>
>      Hi Jouni
>      From discussions at CSS a lot of people argue that
>      Helmut Conrady's conclusion would at least be wrong
>      for games at slow time controls. Helmut tested
>      at different blitz time level. Personally, I believe
>      Helmut is right.
>      Kurt

The argument is easy and logical:
The more positions you search, the more likely you reach positions from the TBs
which are relevant for the current position.
If you search for 3 sec per move it is unlikely that you hit the (right)
tablebase positions than when thinking for 1 minute e.g.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.