Author: David H. McClain
Date: 15:04:00 12/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2004 at 06:02:08, Gordon Rattray wrote: >On December 22, 2004 at 03:49:32, Joachim Rang wrote: > >[snip] > >>So if Chessbase looks on their revenues and not in internet boards they have no >>reason to change their habit. > >Fair point. Sometimes sales/marketing doesn't agree with the best software >engineering policies. > >However, how can a company tell if its revenue is close to its potential or not? > I, for one, don't buy as many Chessbase products as I used to. Bad experiences >reduce the desire to buy in the future. > >Gordon > Gordon, I feel the same. Previously, I waited until the "bug fixes" were available for download before buying, but I found out some still remained, and some were only cosmetic, some still were not corrected after a year, and some should have been so fundamentally obvious to the professionals that it's really difficult to understand how the got through. So, what do we do? Come here to find solutions. This forum has the best beta testers Chessbase ever had.......... DHM
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.