Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:17:36 12/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 2004 at 12:52:55, Pallav Nawani wrote: >On December 23, 2004 at 14:03:34, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 23, 2004 at 13:12:45, Pallav Nawani wrote: >> >>>On December 23, 2004 at 06:25:20, Uri Zlatnik wrote: >>> >>>>How is the search extension of a software improved? Does this have to do with >>>>alpha-beta pruning methods? >>> >>>I am not sure what you mean here, so I'll pass this one. >>> >>>>For example CM 10th edition (the King engine) has longer search extension than >>>>Fritz 8 but it doesn't always find the best move. >>> >>>Search extensions are mainy good for tactical moves. If a positional move is the >>>best one, then evaluation is also of importance. Also, no engine can always find >>>the best move! >> >>The position that Uri Zlatnik posted was only about tactics and not about >>positional moves. >> >>Uri > >Well, maybe he was talking about some tactical position in some other thread, >but I haven't read that one, and he did not specify any position here. He talked about tactical position in the following thread http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?402041 He claimed that it is a positional problem but when you look at the position it is clearly about tactics and not about positional evaluation. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.