Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:36:14 12/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 2004 at 05:56:50, pavel wrote: >On December 25, 2004 at 05:22:29, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I read that the winboard forum decided to ban all members of the arena team >>see http://wbforum.volker-pittlik.name/viewtopic.php?t=1115 >> >>I am not a member of the arena team but as far as I know being a member in the >>arena team is not illegal and I cannot support banning people because of that. >> >>Volker Pittlik did not say only that posting links to the arena website is >>forbidden but also that all members of the arena team are banned(unless he get >>written apology from the webmaster of the arena website). >> >>"2. I expect a written apology from the webmaster of the Arena website. >>3. Until then all members of the Arena team are banned here." >> >> >> >>I do not understand why posting links to the arena website is forbidden but I >>could continue to post there inspite of that decision but banning people only >>because they are member of the arena team is not acceptable by me. >> >>It seems that Volker overreacted to a letter from his internet provider and I do >>not post in the winboard forum until he does not correct it. >> >>I am against rules that forbid links to the arena forum but I can accept them >>but I cannot accept banning people only because they are members of the arena >>team(not because of their posts in the winboard forum) when being a member of >>the arena team is not something illegal. >> >>Uri > > >From what I understand by just reading Volker's post: > >1) Arena team complained to Volker's ISP (for whatever reason). I do not understand what you mean by "Arena team complained" Did all of the members of the arena team complain? Christopher Conkie posted there so I will be surprised if he complained. > >2) Volker's ISP has warned Volker that if Volker ever access the Arena webpage >(even by mistake), they will cancel his contract. > >- This is a serious matter for someone whose internet activity is not limited to >browsing the web. - > >3) The "apology" thing is personal, and goes a long way other than this >incident. > >3) Volker only banned the mention of the webpage, which will automatically get >censored by script; for his own safety. Trying to avoid being kicked out of his >own ISP, "Until the details have been clarified"; meaning temporary. I could accept banning mantion of the webpage but the problem is banning the arena team. > >4) Members from Arena team being banned seems reasonable; and it seems to apply >until they apologize to him. I do not think that they have to apologize unless being a member of the arena team means complaining to Volker's ISP. Maybe I do not understand the term being member of the arena team but I think that it is possible that I could be a member of the arena team only by registering in http://www.playwitharena.co.uk/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=new_user I did not do it but I did not decide that I will never do it. If today they ban the arena team tommorow they can ban me and you. I prefer to ban myself and not to be banned by them. > >Here is something to think about: He is not going to allow people to post in the >forum, on which he spends his time,energy and money to run; who is trying to get >gim banned by his ISP, just for visting their webpage. If you ask me, I probably >would have done the same thing. > >5) What business does "Arena" have in "Winboard" forum? Winboard forum is not a >general forum like "Computer Chess Club", it's a specific forum for winboard and >things that are related to it. People of the arena team can be also interested in things that are related to winboard and they do not have to post about arena. The reason that I decided to stop to post is not banning arena discussions but banning arena team members. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.