Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:15:44 12/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 2004 at 07:01:05, Günther Simon wrote: >On December 25, 2004 at 06:04:17, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>On December 25, 2004 at 05:50:09, F. Huber wrote: >> >>>On December 25, 2004 at 05:40:02, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >>> >>>>Uri, >>>> >>>>I have tried to get more information on that asking in the Arena support forum. >>>>But I did not get additional information. For me the situation seems to look >>>>like following: the Arena team would not like that there would exist download >>>>possibilities for Arena which would be beside of their control. The Winboard >>>>forum obviously does not like to filter such links from its postings. And both >>>>parties seem to be unable to clear that conflict seriously. >>>> >>>>Though links are quite normal in the Web, it is a different situation to offer >>>>foreign contents at one's site without permission. In my opinion establishing >>>>a download possibility clearly is exeeding having a simple link at a Web page. >>>>So the Winboard forum should take care on providing not approved download links. >>>> >>>>But especially at Christmas time it should be possible that the involved people >>>>will find a serious solution for that problem without involving lawyers and of >>>>course without banning wildly selected people. >>>> >>>>Regards, Reinhard. >> >>>Hi Reinhard, >>> >>>it seems you´ve forgotten one _important_ thing: >>> >>>The mentioned download links to Arena files in the Winboard-forum >>>have been posted there by Christopher Conkie _himself_ !!! >>>And he _is_ one member of the Arena team, which "would not like such >>>direkt links to their software" - somehow strange, isn´t it? >> >>Hi Franz, >> >>what if that has happend by an error? What if one has tried to get that posting >>deleted? What if such a deleting request would not have been followed? Does >>that change anything on the wrong situation, having not approved links there? >> >>As I have written, the involved people are grown ups and should be able to >>clear up that situation without such a kindergarden behavior. And it for sure >>would not help to escalate the conflict by involving laywers or banning people >>until finally the next 'nuclear war' will start. >> >>Reinhard. > >I am sure it happened not by an error, but by purpose! >(how do you post a link by accident???) >Just a little time bomb left by that 'Amok Conkie'... >I wonder how Uri could fall into that trap? > >Guenther I did not claim that they posted a link by accident. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.