Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The reason that I decided to stop posting in the winboard forum

Author: Roger Brown

Date: 05:40:46 12/25/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 25, 2004 at 08:10:42, Mike Byrne wrote:

>On December 25, 2004 at 05:22:29, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>I read that the winboard forum decided to ban all members of the arena team
>>see http://wbforum.volker-pittlik.name/viewtopic.php?t=1115
>>
>>I am not a member of the arena team but as far as I know being a member in the
>>arena team is not illegal and I cannot support banning people because of that.
>>
>>Volker Pittlik did not say only that posting links to the arena website is
>>forbidden but also that all members of the arena team are banned(unless he get
>>written apology from the webmaster of the arena website).
>>
>>"2. I expect a written apology from the webmaster of the Arena website.
>>3. Until then all members of the Arena team are banned here."
>>
>>
>>
>>I do not understand why posting links to the arena website is forbidden but I
>>could continue to post there inspite of that decision but banning people only
>>because they are member of the arena team is not acceptable by me.
>>
>>It seems that Volker overreacted to a letter from his internet provider and I do
>>not post in the winboard forum until he does not correct it.
>>
>>I am against rules that forbid links to the arena forum but I can accept them
>>but I cannot accept banning people only because they are members of the arena
>>team(not because of their posts in the winboard forum) when being a member of
>>the arena team is not something illegal.
>>
>>Uri
>
>I respect your right to have position on this issue.  After reading through the
>history on why this has happened, I also respect Volker Pittlik's right to do as
>he saw fit to protect himself.  Is it unfortunate? - Yes, without a doubt.  But
>the truth of the matter is that anyone can post direct links for arena on
>r.g.c.c anonmously -- what will the Arena team do about that?
>
>Considering the legal implications that Volker was in - I would have probably
>have done the exact same thing in all honesty.





Hello Michael,

This might not mean much to others but it means quite a bit to me that you took
time to understand the issues involved.

Uri's post is going to create some heat but it will pass.

Sorry about the trouble, I would have preferred a chance to deal with it off the
air so to speak.

Later.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.