Author: pavel
Date: 22:02:36 12/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2004 at 08:34:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 26, 2004 at 07:48:02, Albert Silver wrote: > >> >>>I can only say that I do not understand the last sentence because it is not >>>logical. >>> >>>The only logical explanation that I can find is that christopher means:"I will >>>return when Volker will be replaced". >> >>I don't see how that could be the conclusion since he is the owner of the site. > >The owner opf the site cannot be replaced. >Is it impossible for example to buy the site from volker? Yes, it would seem impossible to buy the site from volker; unless ofcourse you see mr "cookies" putting a gun on Volker's head to persuade him into selling the site as a possibility. Even than, I think it would be preety impossible. The problem is that you are trying to take mr "cookies" qoute literally. I don't understand why you think this, "I will return and on that day this place will die." means this, "I will return when Volker will be replaced." When it could mean so many other more reasonable things, for instance, "I will return to cause more trouble." > > >>In my opinion the only logical conclusion was that he meant when the site was >>gone. After all, he has alluded a number of times on when other sites were gone >>for good. I think it's more of the same agenda. > >I did not know it. >What other sites you are talking about? > >I simply see no logical connection between christopher and the possibility that >the winboard forum die. There is no connection; and you are assuming that someone said there is, when no one did. pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.