Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 16:48:33 12/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2004 at 18:34:17, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >for me the problems you describe seem not to be avoidable, as I want to go my >own way in chess programming. But there is always an option to ask me again, >when things seem to be unclear. Right. >Imagine that I have to make similar efforts >when I try to understand the explanations of others. Yes, I think I understand your point. But many people here seem to magically use a similar terminoligy. I'd guess that "fully informed moves" sounds rather strange to many. You used "cache" when others use transposition tables/hash tables. Sure, I can understand cache. But when read in such a context, it is a bit confusing. Perhaps I am alone. >I am not patchworking >published computer chess program source codes. I could argue with the same >right than you for others that they would use a strange terminology, but I >don't. But using common terminoligy (is this an English word?) will help in communication. Similar problem in your answer today in the CSS Forum. I am onvinced´, that the PV is practically free in typical alpha-beta (like) search. You seem to mean something very different. BTW. Fabien showed the PV thing for MTD, where all searches are with zero window. Cheers, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.