Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:54:44 12/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2004 at 16:16:08, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On December 28, 2004 at 16:12:18, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 28, 2004 at 15:26:16, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Matches at 40’/40 + 40’/40 +40’ time control >>>Junior9-GUI, ponder=off, 3-/4-men EGTB >>>own books, no book learning, no learning >>>on 4 Athlons 1.3/64 MB hash for all engines >>>First defeat of Junior9 vs Shredder8 in this test. >>>http://www.utzingerk.com/jun9_test.htm >>>Kurt >> >>If you use books and use no learning there is a risk for double games. >> >>Uri > > Hi Uri > Yes, this can happen. But such games will be cancelled > and replaced by new ones (some more work to do of ...) > Kurt I can imagine that this method may allow no testing in some cases. It is possible that 2 programs will repeat always the same game if you do not allow learning. The programs may have a big book but only one strategy is enabled for them in case of no learning and chooising a different book move may happen only after learning from previous games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.