Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 14:14:44 12/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2004 at 16:54:44, Uri Blass wrote:
>On December 28, 2004 at 16:16:08, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On December 28, 2004 at 16:12:18, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On December 28, 2004 at 15:26:16, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>Matches at 40’/40 + 40’/40 +40’ time control
>>>>Junior9-GUI, ponder=off, 3-/4-men EGTB
>>>>own books, no book learning, no learning
>>>>on 4 Athlons 1.3/64 MB hash for all engines
>>>>First defeat of Junior9 vs Shredder8 in this test.
>>>>http://www.utzingerk.com/jun9_test.htm
>>>>Kurt
>>>
>>>If you use books and use no learning there is a risk for double games.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>> Hi Uri
>> Yes, this can happen. But such games will be cancelled
>> and replaced by new ones (some more work to do of ...)
>> Kurt
>
>I can imagine that this method may allow no testing in some cases.
>
>It is possible that 2 programs will repeat always the same game if you do not
>allow learning.
>
>The programs may have a big book but only one strategy is enabled for them in
>case of no learning and chooising a different book move may happen only after
>learning from previous games.
>
>Uri
I have never seen two programs to always repeat the
same game. The wide range of opening lines of the
opponent will not "allow" this.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.