Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: useless long analysis : Traxler gambit after 5. Bxf7+ Ke7

Author: Ulysses Omycron

Date: 07:24:46 12/29/04

Go up one level in this thread


I'm not questioning your analysis (Although yourself called that useless), but I
bet a Deep Position Analysis would been better.

Just run a DPA with your favorite time and root times, with all Branches 24 for
both sides with 4 (Or you can start from anywhere, but lower than 4 is not
recommended) Lenght of variations and a small Evaluation windows (Since you are
not interested in 3rd/4th best moves) and let it run.

Then run in again increasing the Lenght of variations to 5, then 6 and so until
you use all your days. You may need to give ? annotations to the moves that lead
to nowhere but this way you won't only finnish with a more accurate result, you
also have a tree with all the optimal moves and their values.

That's how I'm trying to solve chess, but since you only want the best moves
from both sides, you'd be prunning a lot of variations.

I think that would be "less useless" than just know if Bc4 is better than Bd5 by
0.20 points.

Wishing you get Santa to give you a present January 7. ;)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.