Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:18:31 12/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2004 at 14:58:43, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 29, 2004 at 14:53:42, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 29, 2004 at 14:43:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Here is the current result of a little 10'+10" contest I have running: >>> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >>>1 Fruit_src : 2850 66 149 52 83.7 % 2566 17.3 % >>>2 Crafty-1917 : 2670 85 86 52 61.5 % 2588 26.9 % >>>3 Glaurung : 2660 85 89 53 60.4 % 2587 22.6 % >>>4 Arasanx : 2648 90 90 52 57.7 % 2594 19.2 % >>>5 Movei : 2572 81 93 52 45.2 % 2606 25.0 % >>>6 Ges : 2518 82 83 53 37.7 % 2605 30.2 % >>>7 Natwarlal : 2494 100 80 52 33.7 % 2612 21.2 % >>>8 GreKo : 2389 147 69 52 20.2 % 2627 13.5 % >>> >>>Conclusion: >>>Fruit 2.0 looks pretty strong. >>>The Ges version is 1.32, and I was a bit surprised at how well Ges performed. >> >>I am surprised by the bad result of movei. >>It is certainly weaker than Fruit and probably also weaker than Crafty inspite >>of the fact that I do not think that it is weaker than Crafty19.17 that is known >>to be a weak version of Crafty but I think that it is stronger than Glaurung and >>Arasan. >> >>public version even performed better than Crafty19.15 in a recent tournament >> >>see >>http://www.playwitharena.co.uk/modules.php?name=ATL_League > >I think that there may have been a problem in recoginzing the movei book. I >will look into it. Movei, Fruit, and Natwarlal are not using a book -- not sure why yet. In a 10'+10" contest, lack of a book should be very telling. Not sure why Fruit should still be pounding the stuffings out of everybody.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.