Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:24:07 12/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2004 at 15:18:31, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 29, 2004 at 14:58:43, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On December 29, 2004 at 14:53:42, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 29, 2004 at 14:43:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>Here is the current result of a little 10'+10" contest I have running: >>>> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >>>>1 Fruit_src : 2850 66 149 52 83.7 % 2566 17.3 % >>>>2 Crafty-1917 : 2670 85 86 52 61.5 % 2588 26.9 % >>>>3 Glaurung : 2660 85 89 53 60.4 % 2587 22.6 % >>>>4 Arasanx : 2648 90 90 52 57.7 % 2594 19.2 % >>>>5 Movei : 2572 81 93 52 45.2 % 2606 25.0 % >>>>6 Ges : 2518 82 83 53 37.7 % 2605 30.2 % >>>>7 Natwarlal : 2494 100 80 52 33.7 % 2612 21.2 % >>>>8 GreKo : 2389 147 69 52 20.2 % 2627 13.5 % >>>> >>>>Conclusion: >>>>Fruit 2.0 looks pretty strong. >>>>The Ges version is 1.32, and I was a bit surprised at how well Ges performed. >>> >>>I am surprised by the bad result of movei. >>>It is certainly weaker than Fruit and probably also weaker than Crafty inspite >>>of the fact that I do not think that it is weaker than Crafty19.17 that is known >>>to be a weak version of Crafty but I think that it is stronger than Glaurung and >>>Arasan. >>> >>>public version even performed better than Crafty19.15 in a recent tournament >>> >>>see >>>http://www.playwitharena.co.uk/modules.php?name=ATL_League >> >>I think that there may have been a problem in recoginzing the movei book. I >>will look into it. > >Movei, Fruit, and Natwarlal are not using a book -- not sure why yet. >In a 10'+10" contest, lack of a book should be very telling. Not sure why Fruit >should still be pounding the stuffings out of everybody. Correction: Natwarlal is using book, Glaurung is not (along with Movei and Fruit).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.