Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 06:54:28 12/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2004 at 07:05:52, Albert Silver wrote: >On December 29, 2004 at 21:02:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>Considering that your first post to this forum attempted to offend as many >>people as possible, perhaps humans are silly too :) >> >>anthony > >Well, he didn't invent the title as it came from an article he was kind enough >to translate. I looked at it though and he's right (the author of the article) >in that engines are quite slow to realize white's advantage. They certainly >don't in the key position prior to a4, and are still quite slow, when they do, >to see it prior to Qb5. I didn't spend much time on it, maybe 5 minutes per >engine, but didn't see any that saw a4, which might make it a very good >positional test for engines, unless something else can be provenly found to be >better or at least as good. > > Albert It gets it quicker without SE enabled, but I have to admit the score is still wrong :( and it plays Qb5 :( :( 1. a2-a3 Bg7-f6 2. Ra1-d1 g5-g4 3. Bb6-e3 Bf6-g5 4. Be3xg5 h6xg5 5. Be2xg4 Rc4-c5 6. Bg4-e6 Kg8-h8 = (-0.49) Depth: 11/26 00:00:09.96 10688kN (1073 KN/s, 390 splits, 25 aborts) 1. a2-a4 Qg6-e8 2. a4-a5 Qe8-b5 3. Ra1-d1 Qb5xd5 4. Be2xd3 Qd5xd3 5. Qd2xd3 e4xd3 6. Rd1xd3 = (-0.20) Depth: 11/30 00:00:18.21 21958kN (1206 KN/s, 647 splits, 34 aborts) 1. a2-a4 Qg6-e8 2. a4-a5 Qe8-b5 3. Ra1-d1 Qb5xd5 4. Be2xd3 e4xd3 5. Qd2xd3[S] Qd5xd3 6. Rd1xd3 Bg7-f8 7. a5-a6 Rc4-c2 = (-0.04) Depth: 13/30 00:00:39.94 52998kN (1327 KN/s, 2626 splits, 176 aborts) anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.