Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Junior 9 Test (after 250 games) 40'/40

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 12:29:39 12/30/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 30, 2004 at 15:01:04, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 30, 2004 at 14:54:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Matches at 40’/40 + 40’/40 +40’ time control
>>Junior9-GUI, ponder=off, 3-/4-men EGTB
>>own books, no book learning, no learning
>>on 4 Athlons 1.3/64 MB hash for all engines
>>Details and games for download at usual here
>>http://www.utzingerk.com/jun9_test.htm
>>After the loss vs Shredder 8 it was a bit
>>surprising that Junior9002 also lost vs Hiarcs9.
>>The weaker Junior9001 lost under same conditions
>>less clear vs Hiarcs9 by a result of 23,0-27,0
>>Kurt
>
>Are you sure that 9001 is weaker?
>I can be only sure that 9002 is a later version.
>
>Uri


      Hi Uri
      Junior 9.0.0.2 should be somewhat stronger than
      version 9.0.0.1 which does clear hash tables
      after each move. But to say something concrete
      there are still played too less games I think.
      Nevertheless, I give you the following comparison:
      - Junior9001 vs Shredder8 (40 % = 20,0-30,0)
      - Junior9002 vs Shredder8 (44 % = 22,0-28,0)
      - Junior9001 vs Hiarcs9 (47 % = 23,5-26,5)
      - Junior9002 vs Hiarcs9 (43 % = 21,5-28,5)
      Kurt




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.