Author: KarinsDad
Date: 07:11:28 01/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 1999 at 09:45:12, Peter Kasinski wrote: >On January 20, 1999 at 17:16:05, KarinsDad wrote: > >>On January 20, 1999 at 16:28:14, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>> >>>I think that a real name should be required, even though enforcement would be >>>difficult to the point where it may not be worth even trying to enforce it. >>> >>>I think that anonymity leads to poor posts >> >>Are you claiming my posts are poor? Or KK's posts? What is the real reason that >>anonymity bothers you? >> > > >Anonymity eliminates the notion of reputation. >The image lacks civility. > >PK. > You believe that I do not have a reputation here? I'm sure others would disagree. I'm sure that some view me as an idiot, some as amusing, and others as just another contributor. It depends on your perspective. Even you have an opinion of me or you would not be responding to my posts. Hence, I have a certain reputation within your mind. Whether I am civil or not, well, I thought I have been so far. At least I thought I was as polite as the average contributor. Oh, you meant that my not displaying my real name in order to maintain my privacy is not civil. Hmmm. I'll have to think about that one. Is it more polite for me to have the right to my privacy or for you to invade my privacy? Don't quite know the answer to that one. Dann, Don, any thoughts on this? C'est la guerre :) KarinsDad
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.