Author: Harald Faber
Date: 05:51:45 01/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2005 at 07:46:46, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On January 01, 2005 at 07:40:58, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On December 31, 2004 at 15:21:23, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>Again I agree. Some years ago there was no learning/book learning at all and >>>that was a big missing...which made a big difference with the human players. >>>Now that we have them we need to improve the learning features and not to turn >>>them off! >> >> >>There is danger that one might test the best learner. > >Yes, but I think a chess program is a chess player and so it should be tested in >the best mode, suggested by the programmer, and without removing anything. >The learning feature is part of the program. >Sandro True, but for analysis reasons I do not find it acceptable to let the program play dozens or even hundreds of games to let it learn before I get accurate results.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.