Author: Peter Kasinski
Date: 09:49:50 01/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 1999 at 10:11:28, KarinsDad wrote: >On January 21, 1999 at 09:45:12, Peter Kasinski wrote: > >>On January 20, 1999 at 17:16:05, KarinsDad wrote: >> >>>On January 20, 1999 at 16:28:14, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>> >>>>I think that a real name should be required, even though enforcement would be >>>>difficult to the point where it may not be worth even trying to enforce it. >>>> >>>>I think that anonymity leads to poor posts >>> >>>Are you claiming my posts are poor? Or KK's posts? What is the real reason that >>>anonymity bothers you? >>> >> >> >>Anonymity eliminates the notion of reputation. >>The image lacks civility. >> >>PK. >> > >You believe that I do not have a reputation here? No, you don't. Your handle does. You can change it any time you want. PK. >I'm sure others would >disagree. I'm sure that some view me as an idiot, some as amusing, and others as >just another contributor. It depends on your perspective. Even you have an >opinion of me or you would not be responding to my posts. Hence, I have a >certain reputation within your mind. Whether I am civil or not, well, I thought >I have been so far. At least I thought I was as polite as the average >contributor. > >Oh, you meant that my not displaying my real name in order to maintain my >privacy is not civil. Hmmm. I'll have to think about that one. Is it more polite >for me to have the right to my privacy or for you to invade my privacy? Don't >quite know the answer to that one. Dann, Don, any thoughts on this? > >C'est la guerre :) > >KarinsDad
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.