Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 09:06:24 01/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2005 at 11:43:59, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 02, 2005 at 09:31:12, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>On January 02, 2005 at 09:19:07, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>Moin, >>>gegen Shredder 8 gab es wie gegen Junior 9 nichts zu bestellen für Gandalf. >>>Erneut ein klares 6.5-13.5 lassen Gandalf den 120-Partien-Test mit 52.5 Punkten >>>(=43.75%) beenden. >>> >>>Partien wie immer auf meiner Homepage http://www.harald-faber.de >>> >>>Gandalf 6 auf dem Celeron 1539MHz 200MB hash, permanent brain an und eigenes >>>Buch. >>>Shredder 8 auf dem XP1800+ mit 192MB hash, permanent brain an und eigenem Buch. >>> >>>Bedenkzeit: 2 Stunden pro Spieler pro Partie. >> >>Wird die Hardware noch getauscht in diesem Test? > > >No, the hardware will not be switched, the test is complete. > > >>Für Gandalf, ProDeo, King ist z.B. ein Celeron 2,4 Ghz nicht einmal halb so >>schnell wie ein Athlon 2200+. >> >>TL > > >All my former comparisons show that the XP1800+ (=1533MHz) is <= 10% faster than >the Celeron 1400, running on 1539MHz. Since several months I do not test the >difference with all programs, so I did not compare Gandalf 6. >Maybe, when I am in a good manner and you tell me how to compare them with only >small efforts, I might do it. Well, you switch your thread to english . Ok i will reply in english. As i pointed out before programs like Gandalf, ProDeo and King suffer under the architecture of the celeron processor with its small first level cache. If you can´t change the hardware your tests are meaningless for this programs, because experts choose other processors for chess. Sorry for the bad news. TL
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.