Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 11:22:20 01/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
someone overlooks something and >hangs a pawn, but after it is taken, there turns out to be a winning attack, >was that oversight brilliant or sloppy? That was my only point here. > >Kasparov loves that kind of move. As do we all. I'm only saying that many >times, such 'brilliant' moves turn out to be absolute lemons, once the defense >is found. Can someone find such OTB? Maybe or maybe not. In the actual game? >No of course, as Kasparov won. What about playing that against a computer? It >might have turned out even better for him. Or it might have lost if the machine >played Rhe8 and that is good enough to hold on. > >Everyone knows my opinion of 'Kasparov, the man'. I still respect and admire >'Kasparov, the chessplayer' however. And this was only about 'the chessplayer' >and the move he played... was it good, bad, or just legal? Robert, You must be the only one in the world who does NOT love this game. Why should I bother then!? I have the impression you just don't like Kasparov.... Jeroen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.