Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 02:57:43 01/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2005 at 05:02:52, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On December 29, 2004 at 10:24:46, Ulysses Omycron wrote: > >>I'm not questioning your analysis (Although yourself called that useless), but I >>bet a Deep Position Analysis would been better. >> >>Just run a DPA with your favorite time and root times, with all Branches 24 for >>both sides with 4 (Or you can start from anywhere, but lower than 4 is not >>recommended) Lenght of variations and a small Evaluation windows (Since you are >>not interested in 3rd/4th best moves) and let it run. >> >>Then run in again increasing the Lenght of variations to 5, then 6 and so until >>you use all your days. You may need to give ? annotations to the moves that lead >>to nowhere but this way you won't only finnish with a more accurate result, you >>also have a tree with all the optimal moves and their values. >> >>That's how I'm trying to solve chess, but since you only want the best moves >>from both sides, you'd be prunning a lot of variations. >> >>I think that would be "less useless" than just know if Bc4 is better than Bd5 by >>0.20 points. >> >>Wishing you get Santa to give you a present January 7. ;) > >I wish you a very good year 2005 ! ;-) > >The problem with this methode is that you can miss a good move at the first move >because of a deep fail high, this kind of thinks can happen especially when a >king is in open air ... > >With your method it's very difficult to find a move like : Nxh6 ! > >r3qb1k/1b4p1/p2pr2p/3n4/Pnp1N1N1/6RP/1B3PP1/1B1QR1K1 w - - 0 1 Bad example, I should chose a deeper one ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.