Author: Jason Kent
Date: 08:49:59 01/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2005 at 11:29:48, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 03, 2005 at 11:14:15, Jason Kent wrote: > >>If Pharaon can score this well at 5' + 5", then it will prove to be a monster at >>long time controls. > >I see no connection. > >The only way to know if pharaon3.1 can do better at long time control is by >testing it. > >Maybe previous versions can do better at long time control but it does not prove >if the last version can do better or cannot do better at long time control. > >Uri Uri, While it is possible the newest "bugfixes" could hurt it's strength, I doubt it. Pharaon has had a reputation at excellent results in long time controls for quite some time, and I don't think that will change with a couple bug fixes. This does look promising to me inspite of your pessimism. Maybe you are jealous? Jason
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.