Author: stuart taylor
Date: 11:05:00 01/03/05
Arasan to me, is quite sufficient, and that is something which has been available free, together in full ready working order, easily downloaded. And with a second per move, or not much longer, it gives enough of a challenge, I'm sure, for most of us here. If what WE want, is a personal challenge, without taking back moves, then who here can say this is not enough? And if YOU can beat it at one second per move, with YOU thinking much longer, how about (computer at) 5 seconds per move, or, equal timing? Please don't give me any of this "garbage" about me being a beginner, or similar, I think I'm speaking to any of us here, and even the anti-computer experts, when it comes to equal time. And if not, then maybe only one or two of us is above it. I mean, anyone who can not often beat a human GM, will have a tough challenge even with Arasan 8.1, or similar. Am I wrong? (So why do _I_ want a much stronger engine? Because I have other interests in it than to take up a personal challenge against it, to see if I am brainy enough to beat it). S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.