Author: Ulysses Omycron
Date: 11:27:34 01/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
>>With only deep analysis I think that you will have problems to find it. > >Really? > >Naaa... You didn't do a DPA, you did a multiple lines search, and since you forgot to post the time needed for it, it was pointless (I'm not saying my posts have a point, I'm still DPAing the other position) >New game, >[D]3r2k1/p4p1p/5n2/3p2p1/3R4/1P3KP1/P1r1NP2/R7 w - g6 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 8: > >1. -+ (-3.23): 2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >2. -+ (-3.87): 2.g4 h5 3.Ng3 Nxg4 4.Nxh5 f5 5.Kg3 Nxf2 6.Nf6+ Kf7 7.Nxd5 Ne4+ >8.Kf3 Rg8 9.Nb4 g4+ 10.Kf4 Rf2+ 11.Ke5 Re8+ 12.Kd5 Rg8 >3. -+ (-3.99): 2.Nc1 g4+ 3.Kg2 Ne4 4.Nd3 Rd2 5.Rf1 f5 6.Nb4 Rxd4 7.Nc6 Nxg3 >8.Ra1 Rd2 > >(, 03.01.2005) > >New game, >3r2k1/p4p1p/5n2/3p2p1/3R4/1P3KP1/P1r1NP2/R7 w - g6 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 8: > >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 13/13 00:00:00 70kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 14/14 00:00:00 144kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 15/15 00:00:01 425kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 16/16 00:00:02 836kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 > -+ (-3.23) Depth: 17/17 00:00:05 1931kN >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 4.Rb1 Rc2 5.Nd1 Ne4 6.Kg4 Rf8 7.Ra1 f5+ 8.Kh3 g4+ 9.Kg2 f4 >10.gxf4 Rf7 > -+ (-2.98) Depth: 18/36 00:00:20 8059kN, tb=5 >2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 4.Rb1 Rxb1 5.Nxb1 Ne4 6.Ke3 f5 7.Nd2 h5 8.Rb4 > -+ (-2.97) Depth: 18/36 00:00:32 12752kN, tb=5 >(, 03.01.2005) That's the position after g5... Nobody needed it being analysed. (Unless you prove that multiple lines is better! And it seems it's not, 1 line is faster and gives deeper results). I think I'm not as n00b as I thought, newbie maybe, but not n00b.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.