Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: OK, but which engine is good enough to give most of US a challenge?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 11:57:53 01/03/05

Go up one level in this thread


On January 03, 2005 at 14:49:15, Uri Blass wrote:

>On January 03, 2005 at 14:30:59, Ulysses Omycron wrote:
>
>>>>On January 03, 2005 at 14:05:00, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Arasan to me, is quite sufficient,
>>>>
>>>>Buddy, tell me an engine that is NOT a challenge.
>>>
>>>Nero can be easily beated by strong players.
>>
>>When the original poster said "US" he meant average players, not +1800 rated
>>like you!
>
>The original poster meant also to me.
>
>I do not consider myself as a strong player and I can mention at least some
>players who are probably stronger than me
>
>More than 1800 is not a high rating.
>
>My level is near 2000(at blitz I seem to be weaker and inspite of playing lot of
>blitz in the chessbase site my rating at the time of writing these lines is only
>slightly more than 1900)
>
>Here are names of some posters (from memory) who are probably stronger than me
>(srry if I mispell names but I have no time to check the spelling now)
>
>1)Albert silver
>2)Vincent Diepveen
>3)Martin fierz
>4)Jose carlos
>5)stuart taylor
>6)Franando Villages
>7)Omid david(programmers of falcon he does not post a lot recently but he got
>rating of 2250 before he decided to go for chess programming)
>8)programmer of Jonny(I believe that he posted here in the past)
>9)Dan Anderson or maybe another poster(I am not sure but I remember a poster
>with level of 2400 who posted here)
>10)Georgo Lypako(does not post often but I remember that he posted here).
>
>Uri

I see that I forgot another poster who is better than me

11)Michael Drexel

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.