Author: chandler yergin
Date: 14:56:32 01/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2005 at 14:27:34, Ulysses Omycron wrote: >>>With only deep analysis I think that you will have problems to find it. >> >>Really? >> >>Naaa... > >You didn't do a DPA, you did a multiple lines search, and since you forgot to >post the time needed for it, it was pointless New game, 3r2k1/p4p1p/5n2/3p2p1/3R4/1P3KP1/P1r1NP2/R7 w - g6 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 8: 1. -+ (-3.17): 1.Rc1 Rxa2 2.Nc3 Rb2 3.b4 Rc8 4.Kg2 h5 5.Rb1 Rxb1 6.Nxb1 Ne4 7.Rxd5 Kg7 8.Kf3 Rc3+ 9.Kxe4 Re3+ 2. -+ (-3.73): 1.g4 h5 2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 4.gxh5 Rxb3 5.Ke3 Ne4 6.Rxd5 Rxd5 7.Kxe4 Rd2 8.Kf5 3. -+ (-4.15): 1.Nc1 g4+ 2.Kg2 Ne4 3.Nd3 Rd2 4.Rf1 h5 5.b4 Nc3 6.b5 Ne2 7.Ra4 Rxd3 8.Rxa7 Rc3 4. -+ (-4.75): 1.Ng1 g4+ 2.Ke3 Re8+ 3.Kd3 Rxf2 4.Rf4 Rxf4 5.gxf4 Ne4 6.Rc1 h5 7.Rc2 h4 8.Rh2 h3 Multiple Line Analysis was found "Instantaneously! Any Human selects "Candidate" moves Multiple Lines do exactly that, in Parallel and simultaneously! 00:00:00 It obviously Shoots down the toilet, the concept that the first pV is the "Best" move! We're talkin about a depth of about 14 Ply also! So talk about multiple lines slowing down a LOT is Crap! (I'm not saying my posts have a >point, I'm still DPAing the other position) > >>New game, >>[D]3r2k1/p4p1p/5n2/3p2p1/3R4/1P3KP1/P1r1NP2/R7 w - g6 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Shredder 8: >> >>1. -+ (-3.23): 2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >>2. -+ (-3.87): 2.g4 h5 3.Ng3 Nxg4 4.Nxh5 f5 5.Kg3 Nxf2 6.Nf6+ Kf7 7.Nxd5 Ne4+ >>8.Kf3 Rg8 9.Nb4 g4+ 10.Kf4 Rf2+ 11.Ke5 Re8+ 12.Kd5 Rg8 >>3. -+ (-3.99): 2.Nc1 g4+ 3.Kg2 Ne4 4.Nd3 Rd2 5.Rf1 f5 6.Nb4 Rxd4 7.Nc6 Nxg3 >>8.Ra1 Rd2 >> >>(, 03.01.2005) >> >>New game, >>3r2k1/p4p1p/5n2/3p2p1/3R4/1P3KP1/P1r1NP2/R7 w - g6 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Shredder 8: >> >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 4kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 13/13 00:00:00 70kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 14/14 00:00:00 144kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 15/15 00:00:01 425kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 16/16 00:00:02 836kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 >> -+ (-3.23) Depth: 17/17 00:00:05 1931kN >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 4.Rb1 Rc2 5.Nd1 Ne4 6.Kg4 Rf8 7.Ra1 f5+ 8.Kh3 g4+ 9.Kg2 f4 >>10.gxf4 Rf7 >> -+ (-2.98) Depth: 18/36 00:00:20 8059kN, tb=5 >>2.Rc1 Rxa2 3.Nc3 Rb2 4.Rb1 Rxb1 5.Nxb1 Ne4 6.Ke3 f5 7.Nd2 h5 8.Rb4 >> -+ (-2.97) Depth: 18/36 00:00:32 12752kN, tb=5 >>(, 03.01.2005) > >That's the position after g5... Nobody needed it being analysed. (Unless you >prove that multiple lines is better! And it seems it's not, 1 line is faster and >gives deeper results). > >I think I'm not as n00b as I thought, newbie maybe, but not n00b.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.