Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:26:56 01/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2005 at 01:31:21, Jouni Uski wrote: >I don't mean copy, but strong as Ruffian 1.0.5 and source - this is sensation!! No sensation for me. I predicted before Fruit2 that Fruit will be better than shredder8 in 2007. The good results of Fabian only suggest that the top programs of today are weak because the programmers who work about them are relatively not good programmers. As far as I know no programmer got good results like Fabian in a short time as an amateur(Fabian started to write Fruit in 2003) and I guess that Fabian does not live from chess programming and has another job. >BTW is it joke readme file: > >"Fruit is not fast (in nodes per second) given the little it is >calculating." > >?? Peaks over 2Mnps on my 2 years old PC! > >Jouni I do not think that Fruit can search more than 2M nodes per second on 2 years old PC. Fruit on my A3000 can calculate slightly less than 1 Mnp per second in the opening position. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.