Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 00:02:59 01/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2005 at 02:26:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 04, 2005 at 01:31:21, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>I don't mean copy, but strong as Ruffian 1.0.5 and source - this is sensation!! > >No sensation for me. > >I predicted before Fruit2 that Fruit will be better than shredder8 in 2007. > >The good results of Fabian only suggest that the top programs of today are weak >because the programmers who work about them are relatively not good programmers. > >As far as I know no programmer got good results like Fabian in a short time as >an amateur(Fabian started to write Fruit in 2003) and I guess that Fabian does >not live from chess programming and has another job. > >>BTW is it joke readme file: >> >>"Fruit is not fast (in nodes per second) given the little it is >>calculating." >> >>?? Peaks over 2Mnps on my 2 years old PC! >> >>Jouni > >I do not think that Fruit can search more than 2M nodes per second on 2 years >old PC. > >Fruit on my A3000 can calculate slightly less than 1 Mnp per second in the >opening position. > > >Uri Try this kind of position: [D]8/6k1/8/2K5/4N3/4N3/8/8 w - - Tablebases are not slowing engine. Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.