Author: chandler yergin
Date: 01:37:17 01/04/05
I have been chastised here, criticized, and made fun of for suggesting that Position evaluation of Multiple Lines is wrong. Some Programmers insist that ONLY an eval of = means a Draw, and that any.. "0.xx" decimal reading shows an advantage for one side or another. They insist that this and this only is correct, and that I should STFU! So, I CHALLENGE YOU PROGRAMMERS! Evaluate THIS Position with A-N-Y of your Engines, using ONE OR Multple Lines.. and tell me which side has the advantage! I have already done this with several Engines.. using single & Multiple Lines... Which Side has the advantage? 1769171286: , [D]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 8: 1. ² (0.27): 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.0-0 Nxe5 7.dxe5 Bc5 8.Bxe4 dxe4 9.Nc3 Qxd1 2. = (0.20): 1.d4 3. = (0.19): 1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 4. = (0.16): 1.Nc3 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 5. = (0.08): 1.e3 d5 2.d4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.c4 Nc6 (, 04.01.2005) 1769171286: , [D]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 8: 1. = (0.16): 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nf3 e5 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.d4 exd4 5.Ng5 d5 6.Bxd5 Ne5 2. = (0.13): 1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.e3 e6 4.Bb5+ c6 5.Bd3 Bb4+ 6.Nbd2 Nbd7 7.0-0 0-0 3. = (0.13): 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 e6 4.Bb5+ c6 5.Bd3 Bb4+ 6.Nbd2 Nbd7 7.0-0 0-0 4. = (0.00): 1.Nc3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nf3 c6 4.Bf4 Qb6 5.Na4 Qb5 6.c3 Nbd7 5. = (-0.06): 1.d3 (, 04.01.2005) 1769171286: , [D]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 8: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.0-0 Qf6 7.Bb5 c6 = (0.22) Depth: 13/14 00:00:00 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.0-0 Qf6 7.Bb5 c6 = (0.22) Depth: 13/14 00:00:00 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.0-0 Qf6 7.Bb5 c6 = (0.22) Depth: 13/14 00:00:00 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.0-0 Qf6 7.Bb5 c6 = (0.22) Depth: 13/14 00:00:00 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.0-0 Qf6 7.Bb5 c6 = (0.22) Depth: 13/14 00:00:00 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.0-0 Qf6 7.Bb5 c6 = (0.22) Depth: 13/14 00:00:00 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.0-0 Qf6 7.Bb5 c6 = (0.22) Depth: 13/14 00:00:00 (, 04.01.2005) 1769171286: , [D]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 Analysis by Crafty 19.01: 1.e4 = (0.25) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 1.e4 d5 = (-0.19) Depth: 2/2 00:00:00 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 Bf5 = (-0.19) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 Bf5 = (-0.19) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 Bf5 = (-0.19) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 Bf5 = (-0.19) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 Bf5 = (-0.19) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 Bf5 = (-0.19) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 23kN 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 Bf5 = (-0.19) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 23kN 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d6 3.Nc3 Bf5 4.Bf4 = (0.05) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 53kN 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d6 3.Nc3 Bf5 4.Bf4 Nbd7 = (-0.20) Depth: 8/17 00:00:00 132kN 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e5 Ng4 4.d4 d5 = (-0.10) Depth: 8/17 00:00:00 286kN 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nc3 d5 4.e5 Ne4 5.d4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 = (0.03) Depth: 9/21 00:00:02 735kN 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nc3 e6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 exd5 5.Qe2+ Be7 6.Nf3 = (-0.09) Depth: 10/24 00:00:03 1665kN 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nc3 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Bb5 a6 5.Bxc6+ bxc6 6.exd5 cxd5 7.0-0 = (0.02) Depth: 11/26 00:00:08 4378kN (, 04.01.2005) 1769171286: , [D]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 Analysis by Crafty 19.01: 1. = (-0.04): 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Be7 6.0-0 0-0 2. = (-0.10): 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.Ne5 Na5 5.Bf4 Bf5 3. = (-0.10): 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.Ne5 Na5 5.Bf4 Bf5 4. = (-0.10): 1.Nc3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.Ne5 Na5 5.Bf4 Bf5 5. = (-0.06): 1.e3 Nf6 2.Nf3 d5 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.d4 Bf5 5.Bd3 (, 04.01.2005)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.