Author: Jason Kent
Date: 11:50:47 01/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
My observation is that Ruffian 2.x seems to do better at long time controls relative to Ruffian 1.x! At quick time controls they seem to score similarly. On January 04, 2005 at 14:37:03, Graham Banks wrote: >Pentium 4 (3.2) >256 mb hash >Ponder off, No learning >All using powerbook optimised >3,4,5 EGTB's >Deep Fritz 8 GUI >40 moves in 2 hours repeating > > > >Standings after Round 45 of 54 > >31.0 - Shredder 8 >24.5 - CM9000 Assassin >24.5 - Deep Junior 8 >24.5 - Hiarcs 9 >23.0 - Deep Fritz 8 >23.0 - CM10th Creep >20.5 - Ruffian 2.1.0 >19.0 - Aristarch 4.50 >19.0 - Pharaon 3.1 >17.0 - Pro Deo 1.0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.