Author: Graham Banks
Date: 12:07:37 01/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2005 at 14:50:47, Jason Kent wrote: >My observation is that Ruffian 2.x seems to do better at long time controls >relative to Ruffian 1.x! At quick time controls they seem to score similarly. > Hi Jason, I agree. Too many people have written Ruffian 2.1.0 off whereas it is obviously stonger than Ruffian 1.0.5 at longer time controls. Graham. >On January 04, 2005 at 14:37:03, Graham Banks wrote: > >>Pentium 4 (3.2) >>256 mb hash >>Ponder off, No learning >>All using powerbook optimised >>3,4,5 EGTB's >>Deep Fritz 8 GUI >>40 moves in 2 hours repeating >> >> >> >>Standings after Round 45 of 54 >> >>31.0 - Shredder 8 >>24.5 - CM9000 Assassin >>24.5 - Deep Junior 8 >>24.5 - Hiarcs 9 >>23.0 - Deep Fritz 8 >>23.0 - CM10th Creep >>20.5 - Ruffian 2.1.0 >>19.0 - Aristarch 4.50 >>19.0 - Pharaon 3.1 >>17.0 - Pro Deo 1.0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.