Author: Sedat
Date: 15:56:12 01/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2005 at 18:45:26, Jason Kent wrote: >I've been wondering the same thing. I think the winboard GUI seems the least >buggy and best suited for tournaments (other than the obvious lack of UCI >support without a converter). Can anyone confirm whether converters like >Polyglot hurt the performance of the engine significantly? > >It would be interesting to start a game out of the opening book with all three >of the major GUIs. I have all three GUIs on my computer and I would be willing >to test a bit. > >BTW, is thinker 4.7a a UCI engine? If not, how is it running in chessbase? > >Jason --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Under Arena 1.1 GUI : Thinker 4.7a as winboard engine with WB Protocol=2 Under Chessbase GUI with Wb2Uci adapter [ENGINE] Name=Thinker 4.7a Author=Lance Perkins, Canada Filename=Wb2Uci.exe [OPTIONS] Program=ThinKer.exe hashsize=7 Ownbook=true HashOnCommandline=false InitTime=2 LevelExtend=Strict Edit=edit UseSAN=false Ponder=false Logfile=false Priority=Normal Protocol=2 AddHintMove=false ShowThinkingMove=false ------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.