Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 17:18:01 01/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2005 at 19:26:02, Sedat wrote: >On January 04, 2005 at 19:18:33, Jason Kent wrote: > >>I have always thought that using adapters should be avoided if possible. >>Perhaps that is the problem. >> >>One way to check it out is to run a List512 (or another UCI engine) vs >>ShredderUCI in both arena and chessbase gui with no opening book at a set time >>control. I'll check that out tommorrow unless you would rather do it yourself. >> >>Then of course winboard engines could be tested without book under winboard and >>arena as a similar experiment. >> >>I'm of the opinion that for computer tournaments you want an interface and setup >>that is as simple as possible to avoid "bugs". >------------------------------------------------- >------------------------------------------------- >There are 2 variants: > >Shredder 8 UCI plays stronger under Arena ! > >or > >Thinker plays stronger with Wb2Uci adapter under Fritz ! :) Infact this could be true! Remove the line 'Priority=Normal' in wb2uci.ini In a ponder off match it wouldn't steal cpu-power from Shredder but it gain some because it take a bit more from the gui than Shredder uci. It shouldn't be much in elo but when comparing moves it's maybe enough to make some difference. Odd Gunnar > >Best, >Sedat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.