Author: Sedat
Date: 08:52:05 01/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2005 at 06:02:57, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 05, 2005 at 05:54:19, Sedat wrote: > >>On January 05, 2005 at 05:41:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Hi Sedat >>>Were conditions indeed identical. I doubt because in some games >>>the first move was 1.Sbd2 in other games 9.Sbd2 and this may >>>have an influence on the way the engines are using the time >>>management. >>>Kind regards >>>Kurt >> >>Hi Kurt, >> >>For all GUI's the nunn position was same : >> >>Just under ChessPartner GUI :Gandalf 6.0 UCI did not want to play with : >> >>[FEN "rn1qk2r/p3bppp/bpp1pn2/3p4/2PP4/1PB2NP1/P3PPBP/RN1QK2R w KQkq d6 0 9"] >> >>and thats why i decided to create a nunn position under ChessPartner GUI: >> >>1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 b6 4. g3 Ba6 5. b3 Bb4 6. Bd2 Be7 7. Bg2 c6 8. Bc3 d5 >> >>Best, >>Sedat > > > Hi Sedat > No doubt: the starting position was the same. But it could make > a difference if an engine has play from 1st or 9th move. You > should perhaps repeat the games starting the engines from 9th move. > Kurt Hello Kurt, Yes thats true that there is difference( gaining seconds)in time control between from 1st and 9th move . But we must not forget that: 1)The time control of the games was exactly same with this opening from 9 th move (under ChessBase and Arena)and again the games are different! 2)Under Shredder Clasic and ChessPartner the starting opening was from 1st move and again in both GUI's the games are different ! Allmost all we test only the strenght of chess engines,but rarely there are people who are testing the GUI's And my GUI test shows that : Under different GUI's the engines are playing different ! Best Regards, Sedat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.