Author: Graham Banks
Date: 13:22:43 01/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2005 at 16:03:23, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 05, 2005 at 14:34:19, Graham Banks wrote: > >>SUPER TOURNAMENT IV (NZ) >> >>Athlon XP1900+ >>128mb hash or closest allowed for each engine >>3,4,5 men tablebases >>Ponder off >>No learning >>Engines using own books where able >>CM9000 Minotaur and CM10th Tsunami using CM8000 book (manually converted) >>56 rounds (8 cycles) at 40 moves in 80 minutes repeating >> >> >>Standings after Round 25 >> >>17.5 - Fritz 8 Bilbao >>17.0 - Deep Junior 9 >>13.0 - Shredder 8 >>12.0 - Gandalf 6.0 >>12.0 - Ruffian 2.1.0 >>10.5 - CM9000 Minotaur >>9.5 - CM10th Tsunami >>8.5 - Hiarcs 9 >> >> >> >> >>SUPER TOURNAMENT IV (UK) >> >> >>Dual Athlon XP2000 >>128mb hash or closest allowed for each engine >>Each engine one processor with ponder off >>3,4,5 men tablebases >>No learning >>All using powerbook with optimised settings >>56 rounds (8 cycles) at 40 moves in 80 minutes repeating >> >> >>Standings after Round 32 >> >>18.5 - CM10th Steadfast >>18.0 - Deep Fritz 8 >>17.5 - Shredder 8 >>17.0 - Ruffian 2.1.0 >>15.0 - Gandalf 6.0 >>15.0 - Hiarcs 9 >>14.0 - CM9000 Slayer >>13.0 - Deep Junior 8 > > > Hi Graham > Just amazing: Shredder8 in both tournaments not on the > top ... but still time enough for a change I think. > Kurt Hi Kurt, I wouldn't be so sure in my tournament. Fritz 8 Bilbao and Deep Junior 9 seem superior in their play to date, especially Fritz 8 Bilbao. As you say, time will tell! Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.