Author: Mark Uniacke
Date: 01:36:46 01/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
Fortunately I was reading CCC this morning... On January 22, 1999 at 00:34:04, Reynolds Takata wrote: >On January 21, 1999 at 23:49:35, Michael Ginat wrote: > >>I'm one of the unlucky people who has a DELL and can't run HIARCS -x. I suspect >>the problem is with HIMEM.SYS because DELL had a problem like that before. >>Anyway I've given up trying various DOS tricks and will return the program, >>figuring that for over $100 in today's market one should expect even a DOS >>program should be more user friendly. >> >>Anyway, I'm curious - How much weaker would it play without the extra memory? >> >>Michael Ginat > > >Don't hold your breath on this one, i've asked at least 3 times now, and so has >Didzis Cirulis. I even mailed Mark Uniacke(no response whatsoever), so That is interesting as I have no recollection of having received a single email from you and neither has my address book which captures the name of everyone who has ever emailed me! The email you can reach me on is mark@acc-ltd.demon.co.uk. By the way I have been working with Milton Zuc on this problem over the last 2 weeks or so and I have a test program (NOT Hiarcs) which run happily in extended memory via HIMEM.SYS, I am putting this test code into Hiarcs this weekend. >apparentlu no one knows how much weaker it plays with just the 128 kb of hash, >or it's secret insider-insider information :). Or as they say in that one movie >"Either they don't know, don't show, or just don't care about what's going on >down in the hood"(hahaahaha):)!!! Regards, Mark
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.