Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Junior 9 test (40'/40) after 450 games

Author: Jason Kent

Date: 05:37:25 01/08/05

Go up one level in this thread


On January 08, 2005 at 01:47:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On January 07, 2005 at 16:33:40, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>
>>On January 07, 2005 at 14:39:15, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>    Program                            Score     %    Av.Op.  Elo    +   -
>>>
>>>  1 Shredder 8                     :  30.0/ 50  60.0   2517   2587   89  76
>>>  2 Hiarcs 9                       :  28.5/ 50  57.0   2517   2565   92  76
>>>  3 Junior 9                       : 246.0/450  54.7   2484   2516   30  25
>>>  4 Ruffian 2.1.0                  :  23.0/ 50  46.0   2517   2489   75  96
>>>  5 The King 3.23 T05              :  22.0/ 50  44.0   2517   2475   69  94
>>>  6 Chess Tiger 15.0               :  21.5/ 50  43.0   2517   2468   76  92
>>>  7 Fritz 8                        :  20.5/ 50  41.0   2517   2453   82  90
>>>  8 Gandalf 6.0                    :  20.0/ 50  40.0   2517   2446   94  89
>>>  9 Fruit 2.0                      :  20.0/ 50  40.0   2517   2446   76  89
>>> 10 Aristarch 4.50                 :  18.5/ 50  37.0   2517   2424   91  85
>>>
>>
>>I wonder when this damn:-) engine called Shredder 8 will be beaten? I only wish
>>to see it play a serious game against a top GM.
>>I liked the performance of Junior 9, although i want to see the games first.
>>Although i'm sure it will have some impressive game as always and i'm also sure
>>that in most games will be a Pawn down in the middlegame:-)
>
>      Hi George
>      There is (in my opinion) no program available at the moment
>      that can beat Shredder 8 on equal hardware. And what will
>      happen if the soon coming Shredder 9 should even be somewhat
>      stronger -:) But nevertheless, Junior9 is the money worth.
>      It plays often fascinating games which are nice to look at.
>      Kurt

CM9 Slayer 2 can beat Shredder 8 on equal hardware in a 50 game match even at
long time controls.  Even in my 2005 Kent Tournament II, the only thing holding
Slayer 2 from holding first place is its strange bad performace vs delfi 4.5 and
pharaon 3.1

-----------------CM9k_Slayer_2-----------------
CM9k_Slayer_2 - 10thEd_Stead  : 4.0/7 1-0-6 (==1====)  57%   +49
CM9k_Slayer_2 - Aristarch4.50 : 4.5/7 3-1-3 (1=11=0=)  64%  +100
CM9k_Slayer_2 - Delfi         : 3.0/7 2-3-2 (0==1010)  43%   -49
CM9k_Slayer_2 - List512       : 4.0/7 4-3-0 (0110011)  57%   +49
CM9k_Slayer_2 - Pharaon       : 2.5/7 2-4-1 (0=10010)  36%  -100
CM9k_Slayer_2 - PRODEO        : 5.5/7 5-1-1 (=111011)  79%  +230
CM9k_Slayer_2 - Ruffian_105   : 5.5/7 4-0-3 (=11=1=1)  79%  +230
CM9k_Slayer_2 - Shredder8     : 4.0/7 3-2-2 (01=1=01)  57%   +49



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.