Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 09:03:04 01/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2005 at 11:51:42, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 08, 2005 at 11:21:38, Terry Giles wrote: > >>Hi Kurt, >> >>A most interesting post, as I don't own any Junior programs can I assume that >>this weakness was not present in the earlier Junior 8? >> >>Terry > > Hi Terry > There is no difference between Junior8 and Junior9 > in such endings. Below the analysis of J8. > Kurt > >New game, 40'/40+40'/40+40' >[D]3r1k2/1p3ppp/8/1p6/8/5P2/PPP4P/2K4R w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior 8: > >25.f4 Ke7 > ³ (-0.34) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >25.b4 Ke7 > ³ (-0.28) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >25.Rd1 Rxd1+ 26.Kxd1 g5 27.b4 Ke7 28.Ke2 > ² (0.43) Depth: 3 00:00:00 > ² (0.40) Depth: 6 00:00:00 1kN >25.Re1 Rd5 26.Rd1 Rxd1+ 27.Kxd1 > ² (0.41) Depth: 6 00:00:00 1kN > ² (0.41) Depth: 15 00:00:00 440kN >25.Rd1 Rxd1+ 26.Kxd1 Ke7 27.Kd2 Kd6 28.Ke3 Ke5 29.f4+ Kd5 30.a3 b4 31.a4 h5 >32.h4 g6 33.b3 f5 > ² (0.45) Depth: 15 00:00:01 990kN > ² (0.41) Depth: 23 00:03:35 184045kN > >(Utzinger, MyTown 08.01.2005) Hello Kurt! In this example you are right. J8 play Rd1 too. But in the other 2 example, Junior 8 plays better (!) that Junior 9 (see my other post). Best, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.