Author: chandler yergin
Date: 14:28:35 01/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2005 at 17:20:57, F. Huber wrote: >On January 08, 2005 at 17:01:04, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On January 08, 2005 at 12:20:55, F. Huber wrote: >> >>>On January 08, 2005 at 11:46:22, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>Mrs. Gilbert announced Mate in 35 >>>> >>>>Rather Astounding! >>>> >>>>Shredder 8 certainly hasn't found it yet.. >>> >>>I´ve now tried both positions with different programs and even with some >>>mate solvers, but none of them have seen any mate yet! >>> >>>So I really doubt, that these mate announcement are correct, i.e. that these >>>positions are absolutly _forced_ mates!? >>>(who else could prove this, if not by the help of computers and mate solvers?) >>> >>>Regards, >>>Franz. >> >> YOU LOSE DUDE! >> >>Haa Haaa Thank You! >> >>I can Post the Entire Game! >> >>The Brilliance of this Young Lady.. well, she was married at the time.. >>so not tooo young. >> >>If you want to Verify... >>Check out: >>White: George Gossip >>Black: Ellen Gilbert >>USA ; United Kingdom >>Telegraphic Match, 1879, Ruy Lopez >> >>Then: tell us this young lady was not an amazing Calculator.. surpassing the TOP >>Programs of Today! > >Sorry, but I don´t get the point of your answer! Dumb as well as Blind! ???? > >Would you say, that posting the entire game would be a _proof_ of the >correctness of these mate announcements? Hell Yes! >Even if these games were finished in _exactly_ the announced number of moves, >this is far away from any true proof. Guess ya are Dumb! >I´ve seen already dozens of long mate studies of quite popular authors, which >I (and others) have proved to be completely wrong by the help of mate solvers! BFD! >So again: where is your PROOF? > >Franz. I will NOT keep respondng to DUMBASSES!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.