Author: F. Huber
Date: 14:52:07 01/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2005 at 17:40:54, F. Huber wrote: >On January 08, 2005 at 17:28:35, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On January 08, 2005 at 17:20:57, F. Huber wrote: >> >>>On January 08, 2005 at 17:01:04, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>On January 08, 2005 at 12:20:55, F. Huber wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 08, 2005 at 11:46:22, chandler yergin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Mrs. Gilbert announced Mate in 35 >>>>>> >>>>>>Rather Astounding! >>>>>> >>>>>>Shredder 8 certainly hasn't found it yet.. >>>>> >>>>>I´ve now tried both positions with different programs and even with some >>>>>mate solvers, but none of them have seen any mate yet! >>>>> >>>>>So I really doubt, that these mate announcement are correct, i.e. that these >>>>>positions are absolutly _forced_ mates!? >>>>>(who else could prove this, if not by the help of computers and mate solvers?) >>>>> >>>>>Regards, >>>>>Franz. >>>> >>>> YOU LOSE DUDE! >>>> >>>>Haa Haaa Thank You! >>>> >>>>I can Post the Entire Game! >>>> >>>>The Brilliance of this Young Lady.. well, she was married at the time.. >>>>so not tooo young. >>>> >>>>If you want to Verify... >>>>Check out: >>>>White: George Gossip >>>>Black: Ellen Gilbert >>>>USA ; United Kingdom >>>>Telegraphic Match, 1879, Ruy Lopez >>>> >>>>Then: tell us this young lady was not an amazing Calculator.. surpassing the TOP >>>>Programs of Today! >>> >>>Sorry, but I don´t get the point of your answer! >> >> >>Dumb as well as Blind! >>???? >>> >>>Would you say, that posting the entire game would be a _proof_ of the >>>correctness of these mate announcements? >> >> >>Hell Yes! >> >> >>>Even if these games were finished in _exactly_ the announced number of moves, >>>this is far away from any true proof. >> >> >>Guess ya are Dumb! >> >> >>>I´ve seen already dozens of long mate studies of quite popular authors, which >>>I (and others) have proved to be completely wrong by the help of mate solvers! >> >> >>BFD! >> >> >>>So again: where is your PROOF? >>> >>>Franz. >> >>I will NOT keep respondng to DUMBASSES! > > >And _I_ not to people having a vocabulary like yours! > >So go on dreaming ... ;-) Ok, now that I´ve read through some of your postings at CTF, everthing is clear: You are simply NOT ABLE to write in a normal style - really surprising for a man of your age! May the wisdom be with you! ;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.